Hpv Virus

Lack N, West B, Jeffries D, Ekpo G, Morison L, Soutter WP, Walraven G, Boryseiwicz L. MRC Laboratories, Fajara, Atlantic Boulevard, PO Box 273, Banjul, Gambia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cervical cancer is extremely high in low income countries, primarily because of a lack of cytological screening. The link between human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer has long been recognised, and it has been suggested that isolated HPV testing in women who do not participate in existing screening programmes may be used to identify women at higher risk of developing cervical cancer. This community based study compares two self administered techniques for detecting HPV (tampons and self administered swabs) with a clinician directed technique, the cervical cytobrush. METHODS: 377 rural women were interviewed and of these 210 women had full gynaecological examination, and accepted all three sampling methods for HPV. HPV typing of DNA extracts was performed using polymerase chain reaction and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay techniques. RESULTS: Using the cervical cytobrush as the gold standard, self administered swabs (SAS) showed a sensitivity of 63.9%, and tampons showed a sensitivity of 72.4%. The acceptability of these two tests was 97.1% and 84.6% respectively. When combining acceptability with sensitivity, the SAS detected 61.9% and the tampons detected 60.9% of the true positives. CONCLUSION: In a setting where women are at a considerable risk of developing cervical cancer, with no access to a formal screening programme, self directed HPV testing could be a useful screening tool in identifying those women at increased risk who may require further investigation.

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004 Jan;32(1):62-74.

Colposcopy: the value of HPV testing in clinical practice

Hpv Virus - Article in French

The indications for colposcopy have changed recently because of the new Bethesda terminology, the introduction of HPV testing in clinical practice, and the latest consensus guidelines on management of patients with an abnormal cervical cytological test. Colposcopy remains the reference technique to assess patients with abnormal cytological test results, especially those with ASC-H, LSIL, HSIL, and AGC. In women with an ASC-US result, colposcopic examination of only those who test positive for high-risk HPV increases the specificity of the technique. When liquid-based cytology is used, HPV DNA testing is the preferred approach in these women. In primary screening using combined cytology and HPV DNA testing in women over the age of 30, colposcopy is indicated in patients with normal cytology and two HR HPV DNA positive tests performed at a nine month interval. For the follow up of untreated patients with ASC-US/LSIL and CIN I, colposcopy carried out at one year after a single HR HPV DNA positive test is as sensitive as colposcopy after two or three abnormal cytology tests. After excision or conization in patients with high-grade CIN, colposcopy after a single HR HPV DNA positive test is as sensitive as cytology testing and colposcopy at six months. Therapeutic decisions must not be based solely on the results of HPV DNA testing except in specific cases.

Publication Types:
• Review
• Review, Tutorial

Cancer Treat Rev. 2004 Apr;30(2):205-11.

The role of HPV DNA testing in the follow-up period after treatment for CIN: a systematic review of the literature.

Paraskevaidis E, Arbyn M, Sotiriadis A, Diakomanolis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Koliopoulos G, Makrydimas G, Tofoski J, Roukos DH. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Greece.

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging interest concerning the role HPV DNA testing in the follow-up period after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: A MEDLINE and EMBASE search was done (1985 to March 2002), using the keywords HPV/HPV DNA, together with CIN, follow-up, recurrence and LLETZ. References of retrieved articles were also screened. Selection criteria were original published English-language reports of prospective or retrospective studies, including women with an initial diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, who received conservative surgical treatment and were followed with HPV DNA testing in addition to cytology, colposcopy and/or biopsy); the latter methods were used for verification of residual or recurrent disease. RESULTS: There is a marked heterogeneity in the design, population, intervention and follow-up policy across different studies. The sensitivity of HPV DNA testing in detecting treatment failures was quite good in most studies, reaching 100% in four of them, whereas the specificity of the test differed across the studies, ranging from 44% to 95%. Among women in whom the treatment was considered to be successful, 84.2% had a negative postoperative HPV DNA test and 15.8% a positive one. The corresponding rates for cases with treatment failures were 17.2% and 82.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONs: It seems that a positive HPV test, even in the presence of normal cytology, may pick up early and accurately a treatment failure. Cytology and colposcopy may still be needed in order to rule out false positive and false negative results. MINI-ABSTRACT: A systematic review of studies concerning HPV DNA testing in the follow-up period after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia indicates that a positive HPV test, even in the presence of normal cytology, may pick up early and accurately a treatment failure. Cytology and colposcopy may still be needed in order to rule out false positive and false negative results.

Publication Types:
• Review

Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Jun;81(3):207-12.

Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis.

Ogilvie GS, Patrick DM, Schulzer M, Sellors JW, Petric M, Chambers K, White R, FitzGerald JM. Department of Family Practice, STD/AIDS Control, University of British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4R4.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Providing summary recommendations regarding self collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is difficult owing to the wide range of published estimates for the diagnostic accuracy of this approach. To determine summary estimates from analyses of reported findings of the sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) for self collected vaginal specimens for HPV testing compared to the reference standard, clinician collected HPV specimens. METHODS: Standard search criteria for a diagnostic systematic review were employed. Eligible studies were combined using a random effects model and summary ROC curves were derived for overall and for specific subgroups. RESULTS: Summary measures were determined from 12 studies. Six studies where patients used Dacron or cotton swabs or cytobrushes to obtain samples were pooled and had an overall sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.84) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92), with diagnostic odds ratio of 22.3 and an area under the curve of 0.91. Self specimens using Dacron or cotton swabs or cytobrushes collected by women enrolled at referral clinics had an overall sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.91) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95). Sensitivity and specificity of tampons ranged from 0.67-0.94 and 0.80-0.85 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the combined sensitivity for HPV-DNA is more than 70% when patients use Dacron swabs, cotton swabs, or cytobrushes to obtain their own vaginal specimens for HPV-DNA evaluation. Self collected HPV-DNA swabs may be an appropriate alternative for low resource settings or in patients reluctant to undergo pelvic examinations.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 15;97(12):888-95.

Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.

Kim JJ, Wright TC, Goldie SJ. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

BACKGROUND: European countries with established cytology-based screening programs for cervical cancer will soon face decisions about whether to incorporate human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and what strategies will be most cost-effective. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of incorporating HPV DNA testing into existing cervical cancer screening programs in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy. METHODS: We created a computer-based model of the natural history of cervical carcinogenesis for each using country-specific data on cervical cancer risk and compared each country's current screening policy with two new strategies: 1) cytology throughout a woman's lifetime, using HPV DNA testing as a triage strategy for equivocal cytology results ("HPV triage"), as well as 2) cytology until age 30 years and HPV DNA testing in combination with cytology in women more than 30 years of age ("combination testing"). Outcomes included reduction in lifetime cervical cancer risk, increase in life expectancy, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, expressed as cost per year of life saved. We explored alternative protocols and conducted sensitivity analysis on key parameters of the model over a relevant range of values to identify the most cost-effective options for each country. RESULTS: Both HPV DNA testing strategies, HPV triage and combination testing, were more effective than each country's status quo screening policy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for HPV triage were less than ,000 per year of life saved, whereas those for combination testing ranged from to ,900 per year of life saved, depending on screening interval. We identified options that would be very cost-effective (i.e., cost-effectiveness ratio less than the gross domestic product per capita) in each of the four countries. CONCLUSIONS: HPV DNA testing has the potential to improve health benefits at a reasonable cost compared with current screening policies in four European countries.

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):304-9.

Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening.

Wright TC Jr, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Cox JT, Garcia F, Goldie S, Hatch K, Noller KL, Roach N, Runowicz C, Saslow D. Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, Room 16-404 P&S Building, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an adjunct to cytology for cervical cancer screening. To help provide guidance to clinicians and patients when using HPV DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening, a workshop was cosponsored by the National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute, American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Cancer Society. Consensus was reached based on a literature review, expert opinion, and unpublished results from large ongoing screening studies. The conclusions of the workshop were that HPV DNA testing may be added to cervical cytology for screening in women aged 30 years or more. Women whose results are negative by both HPV DNA testing and cytology should not be rescreened before 3 years. Women whose results are negative by cytology, but are high-risk HPV DNA positive, are at a relatively low risk of having high-grade cervical neoplasia, and colposcopy should not be performed routinely in this setting. Instead, HPV DNA testing along with cervical cytology should be repeated in these women at 6 to 12 months. If test results of either are abnormal, colposcopy should then be performed. This guidance should assist clinicians in utilizing HPV DNA testing in an effective manner, while minimizing unnecessary evaluations and treatments.

Publication Types:
• Review
• Review, Tutorial

Hpv Viruses - Testing for HPV Links

HPV Testing Information for Women - The aim of testing and methods available are described in this file.

Medical Test - Read an overview of several testing techniques for HPV.